Sustainable Biomaterials and Eco-Friendly Protocols in Restorative Dentistry to Reduce Environmental Impact and Enhance Patient Outcomes
Keywords:
Sustainable Dentistry, Eco-Friendly Protocols, Biomaterials, Restorative Dentistry, Environmental ImpactAbstract
The increasing recognition of climate change and environmental degradation has compelled the dental profession to adopt sustainable practices and materials. This paper reviews emerging biomaterials and eco-friendly protocols in restorative dentistry, contextualized, and evaluates their impact on reducing the ecological footprint while maintaining or improving patient outcomes. A comprehensive analysis of highlights innovations in biocompatible restorative materials, low-energy clinical workflows, and waste minimization strategies. The study further proposes integrative frameworks for adopting green dentistry without compromising clinical effectiveness. Visual schematics and tabular summaries illustrate key comparisons and recommended practices.
References
[1] Bauman, B., Anders, P., and Clanton, S. “Energy Efficiency in Dental Practice: Sustainable Solutions.” International Journal of Dental Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 1, 2011, pp. 12–18.
[2] Debnath, T., Mitra, A., and Sengupta, S. “Environmental Impact of Dental Restorative Materials: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach.” Journal of Dental Research and Practice, vol. 18, no. 4, 2020, pp. 233–240.
[3] Yamaguchi, S., Yoshida, K., and Takahashi, H. “Bioceramics in Dental Restorations: A Review of Material Properties.” Dental Materials Journal, vol. 37, no. 5, 2018, pp. 675–683.
[4] Hope, R., McDonald, J., and Patel, S. “Waste Reduction Strategies in Dentistry: A Pilot Study.” British Dental Journal, vol. 226, no. 9, 2019, pp. 673–678.
[5] Mjör, I. A., and Gordan, V. V. “Failure, Repair, Refurbishing and Replacement of Restorations.” Operative Dentistry, vol. 27, no. 6, 2002, pp. 528–534.
[6] Yates, R., and Owens, J. “Sustainable Dentistry: How to Make Your Practice More Environmentally Friendly.” Dental Update, vol. 40, no. 6, 2013, pp. 457–462.
[7] Pjetursson, B. E., and Sailer, I. “A Systematic Review of the Survival and Complication Rates of All-Ceramic and Metal-Ceramic Reconstructions After an Observation Period of at Least 3 Years.” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 18, suppl. 3, 2007, pp. 73–85.
[8] FDI World Dental Federation. “Sustainability in Dentistry: Policy Statement.” FDI World Dental Federation, 2017.
[9] McDonald, C., and Wilson, N. H. F. “Digital Impression Making in Dentistry: A Review.” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 45, no. 1, 2017, pp. 4–12.
[10] Acharya, S., and Tandon, S. “Emerging Trends in Dental Materials: A Review.” International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research, vol. 3, no. 1, 2015, pp. 1–6.
[11] Burke, F. J. T., and Lucarotti, P. S. K. “Ten-Year Survival of Posterior Restorations: A Prospective UK Study.” British Dental Journal, vol. 219, no. 10, 2015, pp. 517–521.
[12] Holmgren, C. J., Roux, D., and Domejean-Orliaguet, S. “Glass Ionomer Cements in Modern Dentistry.” Dental Clinics of North America, vol. 46, no. 1, 2002, pp. 579–590.
